Hunt orders NHS chiefs to set aside gagging orders

The Times Health News 11 August 2014
David Drew, a former NHS paediatrician, said many would-be whistleblowers would still be reluctant to come forwardDr David Drew Adam Gerrard/SWNS

Jeremy Hunt has ordered health chiefs not to block staff from speaking out as he launched a review into the treatment of whistleblowers.

Sir Robert Francis, QC, who led the public inquiry into the Mid Staffordshire scandal, has already begun taking evidence from whistleblowers who claim that NHS trusts and unions are silencing those who raise the alarm over poor care.

In a letter seen by The Times, the health secretary told the heads of English NHS organisations to set aside any gagging clauses.

“We believe that it is crucial that we hear the voices of those who say they have suffered detriment in the past and learn lessons for the future,” he wrote.

“My expectation would be that the existence of any confidentiality clauses, for example in employment contracts or settlement agreements, would not be used as a justification to prevent NHS staff from contributing evidence and their experiences to the review.”

A source close to Mr Hunt said: “The appalling events at Mid Staffs showed what can happen when staff are not able to raise concerns about standards of patient care, and though we have made progress since, Jeremy wants Sir Robert to have access to all the information he requires to make rigorous recommendations.”

David Drew, a former NHS paediatrician and one of the six campaigners whose appeal for justice helped to prompt the review, said many would-be whistleblowers would still be reluctant to come forward.

“It is surprising that the secretary of state has to remind trust chairs that staff must not be prevented from making statements in the public interest because they have signed a compromise agreement,” he said. “What could be more public interest than the Francis review?”

3 thoughts on “Hunt orders NHS chiefs to set aside gagging orders

  1. David Drew is absolutely right. What is there about this review that suggests it is genuinely independent? Isn’t it just another CQC placebo to give the appearance of listening and learning. The CQC can’t give jobs to everyone who has blown the whistle but the SoS should hold to account those who persistently ignored, vilified or persecuted the whistleblowers. That’s the place to start.

  2. to listen to them you think they on your side but these slick tory sales men dont want that truth out there they want you gone but then i wouldnt trust these people just cant see this turning against those who speak out when have they realy cared about you and the nhs never they have their own agenda and could and would use any means to turn it around and show that all the whistle blowers have help them show that selling off the nhs is better but i now and many otherwise do too that they trying hard to sell it off jeff3

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.